In M&A due diligence, the gap between reported EBITDA and sustainable EBITDA can make or break a deal. Most teams are still finding that gap manually, under time pressure, with incomplete data. That is not a process problem. That is an intelligence problem.
Every financial due diligence engagement runs on the same constraint. Compressed timeline. Messy source data. Financials that tell a story the seller constructed, not the story the buyer needs to see.
The one off items are buried. The revenue concentration risk is not flagged. The normalized EBITDA is whatever the model says it is until someone finds the anomaly that changes everything.
"Reported EBITDA and sustainable EBITDA are often not the same thing... revenue needs to be broken down properly."
M&A finance professional, r/FinancialCareers
When you are manually ingesting financial statements and building adjustment schedules by hand, you are trading accuracy for speed or speed for accuracy. The cycle does not give you both.
The professionals who get burned in FDD are not careless. They ran out of time before the data ran out of surprises.
A single customer can represent 40% of revenue and go undetected until close under manual review processes.
Agentic ingestion pipelines can compress preliminary QoE review timelines by a factor of three or more.
It only takes one buried line item to restructure deal terms, reprice the asset, or kill the transaction entirely.
AI orchestration is not a replacement for financial judgment. It is an accelerant for it.
The right agentic workflow ingests messy source financials, flags statistical anomalies, surfaces revenue concentration patterns, and produces a preliminary adjustment schedule in the time it used to take just to format the workbook. Your team still makes the call. The system makes sure you are making it with complete information.
Design agentic ingestion pipelines for unstructured and messy financial statements that would otherwise require hours of manual formatting.
Build automated flagging logic for one off items and nonrecurring adjustments so nothing slips through under time pressure.
Surface revenue concentration risk in deal cycle timelines before it surfaces itself at the worst possible moment.
Develop a repeatable QoE workflow that compresses review time without compressing accuracy or introducing new blind spots.
Doug Skinner — Author, 21 Keys to AI Orchestration | Founder, GTMSOS
This agentic workflow replaces the most time consuming and error prone stages of manual financial due diligence, delivering a preliminary adjustment schedule in a fraction of the time while ensuring your team has complete information before making the call.
A specialized prompt library and workflow for RevOps and FinOps professionals to automatically ingest messy financial statements and flag one off items and customer concentration risks. Built for the pace and pressure of real deal cycles.

Every manual QoE engagement carries risk across three dimensions simultaneously. Agentic systems are designed to reduce all three without requiring your team to sacrifice the financial judgment that only humans can provide.
Book a 30-minute strategy call with Doug Skinner at GTMSOS.
We will walk through your current FDD workflow, identify the highest risk gaps in your QoE process, and show you exactly how agentic systems compress your review timeline without introducing new blind spots.
Doug Skinner | GTMSOS | Author, 21 Keys to AI Orchestration
GTMSOS
© 2026 GTMSOS. All rights reserved.
Home › Finance › The Number on the Page